New Hampshire
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
Elinor Purrier SR 19:13
479  Shannon Murdock JR 20:49
500  Margaret Champagne SO 20:50
913  Riley Gilmore JR 21:22
924  Alyson Messina SR 21:23
1,451  Isobel Kelly SO 21:57
1,482  Angelyn Masters SR 21:59
1,770  Madeline Quigley SO 22:18
1,892  Kayla Farren SR 22:25
2,415  Michaella Conery SO 23:08
National Rank #70 of 348
Northeast Region Rank #8 of 44
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 10th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.5%
Top 10 in Regional 55.1%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Elinor Purrier Shannon Murdock Margaret Champagne Riley Gilmore Alyson Messina Isobel Kelly Angelyn Masters Madeline Quigley Kayla Farren Michaella Conery
Coast-To-Coast Battle in Beantown 09/22 887 19:21 20:56 20:43 21:24 21:41 21:55 21:58
Pre-Nationals (Red) 10/14 18:48
America East Championship 10/28 874 19:37 20:33 21:12 21:13 21:02 22:09 21:34 22:05 22:18 22:48
Northeast Region Championships 11/10 833 19:30 20:31 20:41 21:21 21:27 22:17 22:19





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 10.6 325 0.1 0.2 0.3 1.0 3.5 11.9 18.5 19.9 15.9 11.3 6.3 4.5 3.1 2.1 1.0 0.8 0.2 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Elinor Purrier 100% 13.1 1.2 2.3 4.2 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.6 5.4 4.5 3.6 3.4 4.5 3.4 3.6 3.4 3.1 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.7 2.3 1.7 2.1 1.9
Margaret Champagne 0.0% 180.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Elinor Purrier 1.0 71.3 16.8 6.8 2.6 1.6 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1
Shannon Murdock 50.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.6 0.6 1.0 0.7
Margaret Champagne 52.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.3 0.6 0.8
Riley Gilmore 105.9 0.1
Alyson Messina 107.8
Isobel Kelly 168.8
Angelyn Masters 171.7




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 0.1% 0.1 3
4 0.2% 0.2 4
5 0.3% 0.3 5
6 1.0% 1.0 6
7 3.5% 3.5 7
8 11.9% 11.9 8
9 18.5% 18.5 9
10 19.9% 19.9 10
11 15.9% 15.9 11
12 11.3% 11.3 12
13 6.3% 6.3 13
14 4.5% 4.5 14
15 3.1% 3.1 15
16 2.1% 2.1 16
17 1.0% 1.0 17
18 0.8% 0.8 18
19 0.2% 0.2 19
20 0.1% 0.1 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Brown 0.4% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 1.0